Spain bans chatbot-only support, sets a 3-minute reply rule

Spain just set a legal deadline for how fast a customer can reach a real person. Under Law 10/2025 on Customer Service, companies have to answer 95% of calls within three minutes, and automated systems can no longer be the only option. The law took effect on 28 December 2025, and companies have until 28 December 2026 to comply. If you serve customers in Spain, that’s the date your current setup gets tested.

Who has to comply

The law applies to:

• Companies providing basic services of general interest (energy, water, transport, telecoms, and similar)
• Large companies and business groups above certain staff, turnover, or balance sheet thresholds
• Public administrations, when acting as employers in a consumer relationship

Sectors like finance and telecom already have their own rules. For them, this law works on top of existing regulation, reinforcing quality and protection standards rather than replacing them.

What actually changes

A human on the line, not just a bot. Customers get the right to talk to a live agent, not only an automated system. Companies can’t rely exclusively on chatbots or IVR menus to handle a request.

Faster answers. Companies must answer 95% of calls, on average, within three minutes. Response times for other channels are also capped: up to 15 days for general queries or complaints, down to two hours for incidents affecting basic services.

No surprise fees. The price shown at checkout has to match the final bill exactly. Hidden management or handling fees are banned.

Clearer subscription rules. For auto-renewing subscriptions, companies must notify customers at least 15 days before renewal and offer an easy way to cancel.

Sales calls need real consent. Contracts signed during unsolicited sales calls are void unless the customer explicitly confirms them. Sales and customer service also need to be kept clearly separate.

A paper trail for everything. Companies must keep a complaints register and retain evidence of compliance. If a dispute comes up, they need to be able to show what happened, when, and how it was resolved.

Genuine reviews only. Buying or selling reviews is banned. Companies must verify that published reviews come from people who actually bought or used the product, within the last 30 days.

Ready to grow your business?

Start your free trial today and see results within days.

Request demo Start free trial

Why this is a support tooling problem, not just a legal one

Read through the list above and a pattern shows up: almost every requirement depends on how support is actually run day to day.

• Guaranteeing a human agent means having a system that can route conversations to a person quickly, across phone, chat, and email, without losing the request in an automated loop. This is what a call center software built for fast handoffs is for.
• Hitting response time targets means visibility into queue times and SLAs in real time, not at the end of the month.
• Keeping a complaints register and evidence of compliance means every interaction needs to be logged, timestamped, and searchable, which is exactly what a ticketing system does by default.
• Separating sales from service cleanly means having distinct workflows, teams, or at least clearly tagged channels for each, something live chat software with routing rules and departments can handle without extra tooling.

None of this is achievable with a scattered mix of a shared inbox, a separate phone line, and a spreadsheet for complaints. It needs a system that ties channels together and keeps a record automatically.

What to check before December 2026

If your company serves customers in Spain, a few practical questions are worth answering now:

• Can a customer reach a human agent within your current setup, on every channel you offer?
• Do you know your average response time per channel, or would you have to dig for it?
• Where do complaints get logged, and could you produce a full history if asked?
• Are your sales and support channels clearly separated, or do they blur together?
• If a customer disputes a charge or a renewal, do you have a timestamped record of what they were told and when?

Twelve months sounds like a long runway, but audits, integrations, and staff training take time. Companies that start reviewing their support stack now will have room to adjust. Companies that wait until the last quarter of 2026 may not.

Join our newsletter

The latest tips and deals delivered straight to your inbox.

Email address

Subscribe

Will other countries follow?

Spain isn’t acting in isolation. The EU is working on its own Digital Fairness Act, which would target dark patterns, subscription and cancellation flows, and manipulative design across the bloc, and consumer rules like this typically apply to any company serving EU consumers, regardless of where it’s based (source ). That proposal is expected to be tabled for adoption in the third quarter of 2026, so it’s still in the pipeline rather than in force (source ). But the direction is consistent: the EU’s 2026 consumer agenda already points toward stronger enforcement and centralised investigation of consumer complaints across member states (source ). Spain’s law is a national implementation of that same instinct, arriving earlier and with sharper deadlines than most. If the EU-level rules land as expected, other member states will likely follow with their own versions, and companies that already run compliant support operations in Spain will have a head start everywhere else.

Conclusion

Spain’s Law 10/2025 turns “the customer should be able to reach a person” from a nice-to-have into a legal requirement with a hard deadline. Meeting it isn’t just a policy update, it’s a test of whether your phone, chat, and email channels are tied together, visible in real time, and logged well enough to prove what happened if a customer disputes it. Twelve months is enough time to fix that, but only if the review starts now rather than in the last quarter of 2026.